#SJWs, discrimination and…#Lucifer!

When I first started reading about the burgeoning rights of gays and transgenders in the USA, I was confused. Here is a country that, without hesitation and–indeed, with malicious glee, tramples the human rights of others, and yet is vehemently pushing for the rights of gay people (and I include lesbians and transgendered in this categorisation, for sake of brevity).

While segregation was being broken down in their own country, USians still thought it okay to teach their conscripts that the Vietnamese were “gooks”, not really human, and fair game for any psychotic macho squad leader with a chip on his shoulder.

How could both concepts–equality regardless of difference, and wholesale massacre because of difference–coexist in a country that has always boasted of being the world’s beacon of democracy? How could both be accommodated without the country imploding? Look, if we were talking about Ethiopia or Paraguay or Poland here, I wouldn’t argue the point. But Ethiopia, Paraguay and Poland aren’t standing up and declaring themselves to be better than everyone else. The United States is, and has, for the past seven decades at least.

So what the hell is going on?

And then we get to the Social Justice Warriors (SJWs). These people will fight to the last scream for “rights” for particular groups, while completely ignoring others. Let’s look at a telling example.

I live under a rock basically, yet I’ve still heard about Twitter banning Milo Yiannopoulos, the gay conservative political pundit, from its social media channel. When Yianni’s followers cried foul, the SJWs gleefully informed them that, as a private company, “Twitter is not a democracy” and so can enforce whatever rules it wants. Okay. Let’s accept that. In other words:

  • The government is a public-funded institution and so must abide by the laws of equality, personal freedom, non-discrimination, etc.
  • A private company is, by definition, not owned by the government (at least, not ostensibly) and so can institute its own rules regarding equality, personal freedom, non-discrimination, etc.

Hewlett-Packard, for example, refused to employ women engineers until well into the 1970s but, by SJW reasoning, that’s okay because HP is a private company (not “a democracy”) and so can do whatever it wants.

My question is this: if it is okay for a private concern such as Twitter to ban someone it considers offensive, why is it not okay for a private concern such as a bakery to refuse money from someone it considers offensive? I’m referring, of course, to the case of Jack Phillips in Colorado. And the 111 Cakery in Indianapolis. And the Kleins in Oregon. It was reading about those cases that first made my antennae twitch.

All are public-facing businesses. All have influence in their communities from their public-facing businesses. All have been patronised by their community. In fact, it looks like the bakeries were a lot more polite than Twitter when it came to “refusing carriage”, if you will. The 111 Cakery isn’t a government institution. By SJW logic, then, as the 111 Cakery (or Sweet Cakes by Melissa) isn’t a democracy, why can’t they enforce their own rules?

I understand that Colorado (and Oregon) law is very specific that “public accommodations” cannot refuse service “based on factors such as race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation”, but legislating tolerance down to this granularity is a step backward not forward, and it will be used against society in the future. It looks to me that the bombing-democracy-into-a-country tactics that were used in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Libya and Iraq (to name four) are coming home to roost in the guise of arm-twisting-tolerance-into-a-society, and anyone who doesn’t realise the consequences of what these cases represent is naïve at best.

As are the SJWs. I’m not saying that as a conservative. Anybody who knows me knows I’m somewhat left of Che Guevara. I’m saying that because it’s true. There are two things I wish to point out here.

One, there are already laws for many of the things that SJWs are supposedly fighting for. The United States doesn’t need new gun laws, for example, because the laws in place are already quite stringent. The United States also didn’t need the Patriot Act, because there were already laws out there to prevent the kinds of things that led to 9/11. The failings are failings of coordination, not the legislation itself.

(And, speaking of 9/11, how could the United States fund Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and have Osama bin Laden promoted in mainstream newspapers as a “warrior”, and then condemn him and Al-Qaeda in the United States a few short years later? Wasn’t bin Laden and al-Qaeda killing innocents in Afghanistan? Setting bombs? Coordinating jihadists? Passing out weaponry? But that was okay because…? If you can see the double standard here, then read on. If not, feel free to visit Pinterest.)

Two, democracy. SJWs may not realise it, but they ostensibly live in a democracy. That means there may be people in the country who *gasp* don’t believe as they do. Deal with it. Living in a democracy precisely means that not everyone will agree with everything. But isn’t that why democracy is supposedly superior to every other political system? Because of its tolerance of plurality of views? What was it Voltaire said? “I may not agree with your views, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say them?” Something like that.

SJWs don’t want a democracy. What they actually want is a totalitarian state tailor-made to their own opinions and prejudices. Maybe that could be a slogan: “SJWs: the warmer, fuzzier fascists”? You see, SJWs can only be classified as “left-wing” by people who don’t know what “left-wing” means. To be fair, the Left throughout the world has been coopted so much by now (look up Operation Gladio (see Wikpedia for the apologist version) and research Tony Blair (if you can stomach it) for examples), that I understand the confusion. But, in broad strokes, here’s the difference: leftists believe that people should be whatever they want to be; rightists believe that people should be what they want them to be. It’s a subtle but important difference.

As a leftist, if someone wants to be a hunter, then that’s their choice. There are laws governing the possession and use of firearms, and penalties for misuse. If someone wants to dress in camo and freeze their arses off while waiting for game in the wilds of Montana, then have at it. Similarly, while I may personally deplore urban violence, if someone wants to buy a gun for personal protection then all of the above still apply. No penalty until misuse. Believe it or not, that’s how people behave in a democracy.

A rightist, however, wants control over everything. As an SJW, this translates to: people might use guns to shoot other people, so we don’t allow guns. This is because killing a deer with a high-powered rifle is so much more cruel than kicking turkeys in pens, punching animals with fists, torturing pigs, and keeping chickens confined in the dark with their beaks cut off, right? It’s also a sexier topic. Who wants to muck about in some stinking feather-infested battery hen complex? Yuck. Let’s ban anything remotely ballistic instead! It’s so much cooler, and deer look much more adorable than battered turkeys. While we’re at it, let’s also criminalise anything that even remotely resembles anything ballistic, like a pastry chewed into the shape of a gun, a handbag with gun-shaped leatherwork on it, a thumb and index finger resembling a gun, and so on. We’ll institute classes on how bad guns are, handcuff children who say or do something inappropriate (too many examples to cite, just search on “child”, “handcuff”, “police”), and completely ignore the laws that are already in place regarding the possession and use of firearms. And here we are again.

Another point that’s interesting to me is how young the average SJW is. By and large, these are people with half-baked opinions but no experience of Life to back them up. They just want to see freedom in their small corner of the world, not realising that their utopian vision isn’t scalable. In other words, they’re useful idiots.

rocawear-t-shirt21

So that’s the SJWs and discrimination taken care of. We’re now up to Lucifer.

Now, I don’t claim to know all the ins and outs of the Luciferian thing, but there are some indications that are difficult to ignore. One is a conflation of satanism and Luciferianism. They are actually two different things, “satan” merely meaning “adversary”, but most people aren’t up on the differences (including the adherents) so, to make things easier, let’s lump them together.

Luciferianism is a fad? trend? movement? that’s sweeping the United States, and is particularly dominant among the high-flyers. Jay-Z, Rhianna, Lady Gaga, Kate Perry are all into it, as evident from their music videos and businesses, such as Jay-Z’s line of clothing, Rocawear.

Jay-Z is an interesting character as he seems quite comfortable mashing satanism, Luciferianism and Freemasonry together in one messy free-for-all. Granted that the current batch of pop stars are not exactly the brightest stellar masses in the firmament, but I would guess that all true hide-under-a-rock Masons cringe every time they see one of Jay-Z’s tees on some ignorant status-seeker. At this point, the “Illuminati” agenda that seems to drive these celebrities is nothing but something to laugh about, as these people don’t seem to realise exactly how ridiculous they look. But the real problem comes in the future.

you

Look, I don’t think that any of these people are actual…well, whatever you want to call them. I think they’re just spoilt children looking for something “edgy” because Buddhism didn’t cut it in terms of overcompensating for an inferiority complex. These children needed something cool, dangerous and violent and didn’t want to have to do anything, y’know, real, like travel to Myanmar to indulge their fantasies. So they latched onto a real mish-mash of nonsense to show how much cooler they are than…you.

Whatever we call this gloopy belief system–whether it be Satanism, Luciferianism, Crowleyism, Freemasonry, Illuminatism–there is one belief at its core, and that’s that whomever believes in this shit is more of a human being than those who don’t believe in this shit. Furthermore, this gloopy belief system is the main religion of the rulers of popular culture: those people that all others want to emulate.

And the problem with all that is: Do What Thou Wilt. If you do an internet search on the term, you’ll come across Aleister Crowley (the Gloop’s founder) and, of course, Jay-Z wearing a hoodie with that saying across it. All the rock stars are into The Gloop, and here’s what they believe (with thanks to Wikipedia’s entry on Thelema):

Crowley believed that in order to discover the True Will, one had to free the desires of the subconscious mind from the control of the conscious mind, especially the restrictions placed on sexual expression, which he associated with the power of divine creation

although the Wikipedia writer is also quick to point out that:

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law for Crowley refers not to hedonism, fulfilling everyday desires, but to acting in response to [one’s calling or purpose in life].

Riiiiigghhtt. All these pop stars are actually striving to be better human beings, and the power they wield over the minds of their followers doesn’t give them the slightest thrill whatsoever. Sure, I’m buying that.

Of course, if you start drilling down past the righteous propaganda, you’ll come across some interesting stuff like, say, the Thelemic deity, Babalon. Have sex at the right time with the incarnation of Babalon (the Scarlet Whore, natch) and:

If the adept gives himself totally to her—the symbol of this act being the pouring of the adept’s blood into her graal—he becomes impregnated in her, then to be reborn as a Master of the Temple and a saint that dwells in the City of the Pyramids.

Master of the Temple, eh? And a saint, no less? Yep, doesn’t sound like overinflating one’s ego at all. ::eye-roll::

To move on, The Gloops seem to further believe that everyone on the planet can be divided into predator and prey. And guess which category they are in?

I’ve taken the long way round on this one, but now that I’ve laid out all the points, I’m able to pull it all together.

If the SJWs can be used to crush any kind of dissent (“you can’t discriminate against gays”, “you can’t carry weapons”, “you can’t vote for anyone I don’t like”), then that leaves their gods (the Gloopers) open to basically rape and pillage at will with their enthusiastic support. Now, I don’t think gays are aberrant in any way, I don’t believe they should be discriminated against, but can you see the slippery slope here? Gays? Cool. Guns? Not cool. Female war criminal? Cool. Male strutting bombast? Not cool.

Who makes these decisions? Not the people chanting in the streets. No, they’re being played by people like the billionaire Hyatt hotel family and dear old George Soros (and, seriously, why isn’t he dead yet?). Yes of course all these Very Rich People are deeply, deeply concerned about gay and women’s rights. They believe in democracy and love each and every human being alive. Don’t they? I mean, they’re paying money for anti-Trump riots. Doesn’t that mean that the ultra-rich love us?

Hmmm… Once you factor in where all this activist largesse is coming from, it’s starting to look less like freedom and more like gangster-organised repression. Which is how people end up believing that up is down and ultra-right is left, so fired up are they by a bit of cash, fifteen minutes of validation and their small and hobbled definitions of freedom. It’s not about justice, freedom or democracy. It’s about an agenda. And, coming as it does from very rich people who wouldn’t spit on us if we were on fire, the agenda is a fascist one.

I don’t think I’m drawing too long a bow here. There’s nothing worse than an infantile belief system coupled with infantile minds, backed by the deep pockets of people who don’t care if we live or die. In the Gloopers and their followers, we see the union of all three elements. An unholy trinity, if you will (heh heh).

Do What Thou Wilt.

Isn’t that what the rich have done so far? Whatever they’ve wanted? No prosecutions, no investigations. We’ve already seen what Do What Thou Wilt has wrought. Have you forgotten already? Their infantile offspring, the Gloopers, run around making nihilism sexy, urging the public to follow them. And they do.

Sure, right now we’re just talking the advancement of science, the right to abortion, nice stuff like that. The problem is, I don’t believe them. Ignoring those masquerading as world and business leaders for the time being, I’ve tried to nail down the Luciferians through much reading and research and they’re slippery fish. Roman Catholicism is easy. Everything they believe is so clearly laid out that criticising them is like shooting fish in a barrel. The Luciferians are in a different kettle, and because they chop and change according to whom they’re talking to, I don’t trust them at all.

Now is an interesting time to be alive. Notice I didn’t say “good”. Young people, disillusioned with organised religion, are looking for answers. What better than a cult of “enlightenment” that tells them that they’re basically good, tolerant, rational people who only believe in peace, freedom and technology, and that they can’t evolve because they’re trapped by hateful zealots driven by racism, techophobia and fundamentalism. It’s nice to think that you’re superior to everyone else, isn’t it? Even though you needed someone else to put that thought in your head in the first place.

My spidey-sense is telling me that the whole Lucifer thing is one big con job…the Big Bad Wolf dressed up in Grandma’s clothes in order to lure you closer. And by the time you find out how sharp those teeth are, it’s going to be too late.

Organised religions have recklessly squandered whatever credibility they ever had through their thoughtlessness, ruthlessness, unending deception and lust for power. You’ll get no argument from me on that. But guess what? There’s a spanking new techno-dogma in the room and it’s going to wipe the floor with all who came before it.

I’m not looking forward to it. Pass the blood-soaked popcorn, will you?

This article © Kaz Augustin, 2016

* If you liked this article, please consider the Paypal tipjar in the site’s sidebar. I’ll be trying to hit big issues in ways that may not be obvious twice a month, on the first and fifteenth, and every cent helps. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *